Categories
News Article

Understanding Surfactant Retention in Chemical EOR

In surfactant flooding, surfactants are injected into the reservoir to help increase oil recovery, one of which is by reducing the interfacial tension (IFT) between oil and water. However, not all injected surfactants will continue to move with the fluid phase. Some surfactants may be retained within the porous media through several mechanisms. Understanding surfactant retention is important for evaluating how surfactants are transported through the rock and how retention can affect the efficiency of chemical in Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR).

Figure 1. Surfactant flow through porous rock during injection.
Figure 2. Surfactant retention due to interactions with mineral surfaces and the pore system.

What Happens to Surfactants in Porous Media?

When surfactants flow through the rock, their molecules can interact with the rock surface and the fluids within the pores. These interactions can cause some surfactants to be retained within the porous media.

Several mechanisms of surfactant retention includes:

  • Adsorption, which is the interaction of surfactant molecules with the rock surface, causing the surfactants to be adsorbed onto the surface.
  • Phase trapping, which is the retention of surfactants due to the distribution and interactions between phases within the pores.
  • Precipitation, which is the formation of precipitates or solid phases under certain conditions, causing some surfactants to no longer remain in the flowing fluid phase.

These mechanisms can affect surfactant transport within the porous media.

Figure 3. Several mechanisms of surfactant retention.

Why Does Surfactant Retention Important?

Retained surfactants no longer move with the flowing phase. Retention higher can reduce the amount of surfactant that continues to move through the porous media and potentially increase the requirement chemical to reach the target area.

Therefore, retention is one of the important aspects in evaluating chemical behavior and efficiency in chemical state in the Chemical EOR. However, retention is not the only parameter for assessing surfactant performance. The evaluation may also include IFT, phase behavior, stability, wettability, and the performance of coreflood.

Figure 4. Why surfactant retention is important.

How is Retention Evaluated in the Laboratory?

Retention can be studied through both static and dynamic tests. In dynamic tests such as coreflood, surfactant is flowed through a core plug, and then effluent the effluent collected and analyzed.

In simple terms, the test can be conducted through the following stages:

Brine saturation → Surfactant injection through the core → Post-flush → Effluent collection → Concentration analysis

In simple terms, the amount of surfactant injected is compared with the amount of surfactant recovered from the effluent. Based on the material balanceapproach, the difference between the two can be used to estimate the amount of surfactant retained within the porous media:

Surfactant injected − Surfactant recovered = Surfactant retained

The result of retention can be expressed, for example, in mg of surfactant/g of rock.

Figure 5. Stages of the dynamic test conducted to evaluate surfactant retention.
Figure 6. How to estimate the amount of surfactant retained in porous media using an approach of material balance.

Factors Affecting Retention

The extent of surfactant retention can vary in each system and is influenced by various factors, including:

  • rock type and mineralogy
  • surfactant type and concentration
  • brine composition and salinity brine
  • pH
  • temperature
  • the interactions of rock–surfactant–brine

Therefore, testing under conditions relevant to the reservoir system is an important part of evaluation Chemical EOR.

From Laboratory to EOR Application

The data of surfactant retention provide an overview of how surfactants are transported through porous media and can be used as one part of the screening and evaluation of Chemical EOR.

In its application, the data of retention do not stand alone. The test results need to be considered together with other parameters such as IFT, phase behavior, stability, wettability, and coreflood performance to provide a more comprehensive understanding of chemical behavior and performance.

Thus, the testing of retention—particularly under dynamic conditions—can help connect evaluation chemical in laboratory with the need of design and development Chemical EOR.

For Information and Collaboration
EOR Laboratory ITB
Email: eor@itb.ac.id

OGRINDO ITB
Email: info@ogrindoitb.com
Website: www.ogrindoitb.com

Categories
News Article

OGRINDO ITB Research Breakthrough: Combination of Surfactant & Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles, Enhances Oil Recovery in Sandstone Reservoir

Innovation in technology Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) continues to evolve to address production challenges in mature oil fields. One of the current approaches gaining attention from researchers is the utilization of titanium dioxide (TiO₂) nanoparticles to improve surfactant performance in oil recovery processes, particularly in sandstone.

A research team from OGRINDO ITB recently published their latest research findings in a scientific article titled:
“Enhancement of Surfactant Performance via Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles: Implication for Oil Recovery in Sandstone.”

🌟 What Makes This Research Special?

Surfactant alkyl ethoxy carboxylate (AEC) surfactant is one of the chemical agents commonly used in EOR methods. However, the OGRINDO team went further by exploring how the addition of TiO₂ nanoparticles to AEC could drastically alter the system’s performance. Comprehensive testing was conducted, covering:

  • Interfacial tension
  • Contact angle
  • Zeta potential
  • Coreflooding test

State of the Art

The latest innovation in this research is the evaluation of AEC surfactant performance by adding TiO₂ nanoparticles within a concentration range of 0%–0.05% w/w.

The addition of 0.05% w/w TiO₂ nanoparticles to 1.25% w/w AEC surfactant was able to reduce interfacial tension to a value of 5.85 × 10⁻⁵ mN/m. This excellent performance was also confirmed in the coreflooding,, where oil recovery increased to a maximum value of 59.52%.

This finding highlights the importance of TiO₂ nanoparticle stability in surfactant solutions, which turns out to be the key factor in enhancing oil recovery efficiency.

Figure 1: Contact angles of all tested solutions on the Berea sandstone thin section. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the measurements
Figure 2: Effect of TiO₂ nanoparticle addition to AEC surfactant on interfacial tension (adapted from Megayanti et al. (2023))

Why Is This Important?

This research provides valuable new insights into the development of surfactant- and nanoparticle-based EOR methods. With this approach, it is expected to open new opportunities for improving oil recovery efficiency from sandstone reservoir — especially in fields that have experienced production decline.

This discovery also strengthens OGRINDO’s position as a leading EOR research center in Indonesia, focusing on the development of environmentally friendly, sustainable technologies tailored to national industry needs.

📚 Read the full journal here

🌐 Explore More of Our Flagship Research

Visit the complete list of OGRINDO ITB scientific publications to explore our breakthroughs in Enhanced Oil Recovery, CO₂, hydrogen, and other energy transition technologies: 👉 OGRINDO ITB Scientific Publications

Through research, collaboration, and innovation, OGRINDO ITB is committed to being at the forefront of supporting national and global energy transformation.

Let’s create a smarter and more sustainable energy future — together with OGRINDO.

🙏 Acknowledgement

The researchers express their gratitude to Oil and Gas Recovery for Indonesia (OGRINDO) ITB and the Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) ITB for access to the experimental equipment used in this study.